Research Interests

A fundamental and unresolved question in neuroscience is how the activities of tens of billions of interconnected neurons are coordinated during learning, decision making, and sleep. Resolving this question is important as dysregulated coordination between neurons contributes to disorders such as epilepsy, Parkinson’s disease, Down syndrome, and schizophrenia. My research seeks to understand the mechanisms by which the activities of ensembles of neurons and dopamine release are organized during learning and sleep. To illustrate, we have recently published data indicating that normal aging is associated with alterations in the reliability and precision of neuronal firing during sleep and that these changes can impact between-neuron interactions. Furthermore, we observed that aged rats expressed a significant reduction of the peak frequency and rate of occurrence of high-frequency “ripple” oscillations associated with memory consolidation. Ongoing work in my laboratory seeks to determine if such changes contribute to age-associated memory decline or, instead, result from adaptive processes that compensate for the negative physiological consequences of aging.

Our research interests:

  • Understanding how interacting groups of neurons represent the value of anticipated outcomes, planned actions, and physical space.
  • Determining the neural origins of age-associated memory loss and the role of sleep in the memory formation process.
  • Identifying neural mechanisms underlying Parkinson’s disease and the biomarkers that precede motor symptom onset.
  • Developing new technologies to enhance our ability to measure the effects of neuromodulator release (e.g., dopamine) on the activities of large groups of interacting neurons.

Above: a photo with some glowing artistic effects that illustrates one of the decision-making mazes that we use in the lab to assess reward and effort-guided decision making.

Above: This heatmap represents the firing activity (the rate of action potentials) of a single neuron in the rat prefrontal cortex. The neuron was recorded as the animal ran around a maze (illustrated in the picture above). The neuron was most active during the approach the the choice-zone of the maze.

 

More details on the discoveries and research questions addressed in our laboratory:

1. Aging is associated with altered single-unit coordination and local-field oscillatory activity.

The hippocampus is critical for the formation of episodic memories, and this capacity is reduced over the course of normal aging. Sharp-wave ripple events are high-frequency (~150 Hz) oscillations generated within the hippocampus, and these events have been implicated in the stabilization of long-term memories. Our analysis of these oscillations and single-unit activity in aged and young rats identified key changes that occur through the lifespan. Specifically, results from our analysis indicated that aging is accompanied by a decline in the rate of occurrence of ripple events and an increase in the variance of spike timing. Together, these changes may contribute to age-associated memory decline1.

1.    Wiegand J-PL, Gray DT, Schimanski LA, Lipa P, Barnes CA, Cowen SL (2016) Age Is Associated with Reduced Sharp-Wave Ripple Frequency and Altered Patterns of Neuronal Variability. J Neurosci 36:5650–5660.

2. Neural correlates of working memory can be tightly coupled with body movements.

In 1971, two seminal observations were published that provided compelling evidence that the brain was capable of storing sensory-independent representations of memories in the activities of individual neurons. These two observations were the identification of delay cells (Fuster and Alexander; Kubota and Niki) and place cells (O’Keefe and Dostrovsky). A question that has guided me throughout my career has been how such representations are sustained through time. In one of my first investigations of this question, I measured the activities of ensembles of neurons in the medial prefrontal cortex as rats performed memory-guided behaviors. Analysis confirmed that prefrontal neurons exhibit clear delay activity for expected cues and outcomes; however, detailed analysis of head movements determined that nearly all of these “delay neurons” were exceptionally sensitive to small changes in body posture. Indeed, the movements themselves were highly selective for the stored memory1. A parsimonious explanation for this result was that animals can adopt embodied solutions for solving the working-memory tasks whereby unique movements help animals offload some working memory demands to the body. Our results further demonstrated that higher-order regions such as the frontal cortex are exceedingly sensitive to lower-order inputs such as motor efference-copy and somatosensory information.

1.    Cowen SL, McNaughton BL (2007) Selective delay activity in the medial prefrontal cortex of the rat: contribution of sensorimotor information and contingency. J Neurophysiol 98:303–316.

3. Anterior-cingulate neurons are involved in post-decision action maintenance and value prediction.

The previously-described observation that motor activity plays a role in modulating “delay cell” activity in the prefrontal cortex motivated a renewed exploration of theories of frontal function that incorporate representations of body movement. One such theory is the proposal that the medial prefrontal cortex, and, specifically the anterior cingulate cortex, is central for the evaluation of the cost of physical effort and uses this information to guide cost-benefit decision making. To identify the physiological correlates of this process, I used arrays of single-unit electrodes to record ensemble activity in the anterior cingulate cortex as animals made effort- and reward-guided evaluations. Surprisingly, results indicated that neurons responding to the anticipated cost of effort responded at least 100 milliseconds after animals made their decision, suggesting that these neurons do not contribute to deliberation, but, instead, to the capacity to sustain goal-directed behaviors after the decision is made. This led to our proposal that the anterior cingulate cortex facilitates “perseverance” by regulating both glutamatergic and dopaminergic transmission in the motor cortex and dorsal striatum.

1.    Cowen SL, Davis GA., Nitz DA. (2012) Anterior cingulate neurons in the rat map anticipated effort and reward to their associated action sequences. J Neurophysiol 107:2393–2407.

2.    Miller MA, Thomé A, Cowen SL (2013) Intersection of effort and risk: ethological and neurobiological perspectives. Front Neurosci 7:208.

4. Expanding the traditional view of the hippocampal representation of space.

The discovery of the hippocampal place cell (O’Keefe and Dostrovsky, 1971) provided convincing physiological evidence that the hippocampus creates a cognitive map of the environment. With time, it was found that the response properties of these place cells were more nuanced than expected. For example, “place cells” were found to be sensitive to both location and trajectory and that these neurons coupled their activity to specific phases of the hippocampal theta (7 Hz) oscillation. My research contributed to the expansion of the traditional view of the place cell by challenging the view that spatial coding in the hippocampus is an exclusive property of principal cells. Together with Drew Maurer and Bruce McNaughton, we determined that inhibitory interneurons convey precise information about space, and that this information is only identifiable if the phase of the theta rhythm at which interneurons fire is accounted for3. We used this phase-based definition of the place field to improve upon existing measures of place-field sizes, an approach which became useful in quantifying how the spatial scale of the cognitive map changes in different regions of the hippocampus2.

The second way my research extended the understanding of hippocampal function emerged from my collaboration with Dr. Douglas Nitz and our investigation of repeating place fields-- a recently-discovered phenomenon whereby multiple fields appear when animals visit locations with similar behavioral or visual features (Derdikman et al., 2009). Dr. Nitz and I found that these repeating fields shift forward in space as animals run on spiral-shaped tracks. Further experiments revealed that this shift was most likely due to a buildup of inertial navigation error, suggesting that animals were actually using an inertial/vestibular strategy as opposed to a visual cue based navigation strategy – even in brightly-lit rooms. This is an interesting contribution as one assumption in the field is that inertial navigational strategies are only employed when visual cues are unavailable.

1.    Cowen SL, Nitz DA (2014) Repeating Firing Fields of CA1 Neurons Shift Forward in Response to Increasing Angular Velocity. J Neurosci 34:232–241.

2.    Maurer AP, Cowen SL, Burke SN, Barnes CA, McNaughton BL (2006a) Organization of hippocampal cell assemblies based on theta phase precession. Hippocampus 16:785–794.

3.    Maurer AP, Cowen SL, Burke SN, Barnes CA, McNaughton BL (2006b) Phase precession in hippocampal interneurons showing strong functional coupling to individual pyramidal cells. J Neurosci 26:13485–13492.

5. Development of technologies for the neuroscience community.

My students and I have worked to develop software and hardware to assist the neuroscience community. Below is a list of some of these contributions:

  • Produced an interactive graphical system for real-time and off-line spike sorting (Waveform Cutter, Cowen 2002). This tool became an integral part of MClust (David Redish, U. Michigan), one of the most popular open-source spike-sorting systems.
  • To better characterize fine body movements in animals as they perform decision-making behaviors, I developed a novel 9-axis head-mounted inertial measurement system. Prototypes of this system are being developed for three laboratories for the investigation brain-body interactions in the hippocampus, parietal cortex, and prefrontal cortex.
  • My lab has designed and built numerous automated maze systems for the training and testing of decision-making and memory-driven behaviors. The design and required software is freely available online. I helped set up these systems in the laboratories of three collaborators and they continue to be used.
  • We were awarded a 2014 NSF BRAIN EAGER grant to develop technologies for the simultaneous recording of the activities of ensembles of neurons and real-time measurement of dopamine release. Since receiving support, we have produce working versions of this device and successfully tested the device in anesthetized and awake and behaving rats. The next stage of development will be to improve the hardware and software to improve robustness and ease of use.